[Geary] libgda instead sqlheavy

[Christian Dywan]

On Di 10 Apr 2012 14:30:59 CEST, Javier Jardón wrote:
>
> I was taking a look to this project and I wonder if you consider to
> use libgda instead sqlheavy?
> libgda has vala bindings nowadays thanks to gobject introspection.
That's a curious argument, given that sqlheavy is *written* in Vala. ;-)

But I'd be interested what makes libgda worth looking into, and what it
may provide over sqlheavy.

http://www.gnome-db.org/
http://live.gnome.org/ChooseLibgdaSQLite

From a quick look, libgda can support other databases, XML, threaded
access, meta data and GUI.

Does it have any search capabilities? It's not mentioned there. And it
says it's impossible to access the underlying database API.

ciao,
    Christian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 900 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.yorba.org/pipermail/geary/attachments/20120410/261b2ba0/attachment.pgp>