[Shotwell] Shotwell performance in Lucid Lynx

[caccolangrifata]

It's seems that there is some problem with libglib2 2.23
Can you check the version of this library?
in ubuntu the package name is libglib2.0-0


Il giorno sab, 27/02/2010 alle 14.24 +0200, Roman Yepishev ha scritto:
> Hello,
> 
> I have updated my system to Lucid Lynx where shotwell is present in the
> repository and it looks like it does not work well there.
> 
> First of all, when progress bar is displaying the loading state during
> startup, the following lines flood the terminal:
> 
> (shotwell:4753): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_value_get_pointer:
> assertion `G_VALUE_HOLDS_POINTER (value)' failed
> 
> When the main window is loaded, the "Photos" meta-event is selected but
> no images are displayed in the image pane. It looks like redrawing is
> not happening.
> 
> It is possible to trigger the redraw by clicking on one of the "photos".
> In this case the whole aria is redrawn, however during scrolling some
> photos are still missing or only partially displayed.
> 
> When photos are imported, the event pane is not updated with the new
> nodes, the photos are only available via Photos meta-event.
> 
> Facebook upload plugin seems to be having problems during
> initialization.
> The following is printed to the terminal:
> Entity: line 183: parser error : expected '>'
> </photos_getAlbums_resp
>                        ^
> Entity: line 183: parser error : Opening and ending tag mismatch:
> photos_getAlbums_response line 2 and photos_getAlbums_resp
> </photos_getAlbums_resp
>                        ^
> However, the photos do get uploaded but it looks like it performs pretty
> serious computations consuming a lot of CPU time to upload every photo.
> 
> Additionally, it is not possible to build shotwell from 0.4.3 sources in
> stock Lucid Lynx install with Vala 0.7.10, see
> http://paste.ubuntu.com/385037/
> Compilation failed: 12 error(s), 56 warning(s)
> 
> I will be happy to provide any additional info regarding the issue. I
> know this has to go to bug reports, but I'd appreciate that if someone
> else could confirm these issues.
> _______________________________________________
> Shotwell mailing list
> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org
> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Questa ? una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
URL: <http://lists.zaftra.yorba.org/pipermail/shotwell/attachments/20100227/5f72fde3/attachment.pgp>