[Shotwell] Shotwell 0.7 plan

[Bruno Girin]

On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 12:09 -0700, Adam Dingle wrote:
> On 07/02/2010 12:00 PM, Bruno Girin wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 10:29 -0700, Adam Dingle wrote:
> >    
> >
> >>       * Rating photos. The user will be able to assign any of the
> >> following ratings to each photo: unrated (the default), 1-5 stars, or
> >> Rejected (the lowest rating). You will be able to sort and/or filter by
> >> rating. By default, Shotwell will display all photos except rejected
> >> photos. In the browser view, we'll have a dropdown menu on the toolbar
> >> that will allow you to select a different filter, e.g. only 3 stars and
> >> higher. This will replace Shotwell's existing hidden/favorites
> >> mechanism. When you upgrade from 0.6 to 0.7, all previously hidden
> >> photos will become Rejected and all previously favorite photos will be
> >> assigned a rating of 5 stars.  [http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2233]
> >>      
> > Considering that F-Spot includes, a 1-5 star rating, a hidden flag and a
> > favorite tag, what should be the behaviour when an F-Spot photo is
> > imported that is hidden, has a rating of 3 stars and has the favorite
> > tag attached? Does the rating take precedence?
> >    
> 
> I'd suggest that if an F-Spot photo has a numeric rating (3 stars in 
> this case), we should use that.  If it has no rating, but is a favorite, 
> let's give it 5 stars.  If it has no rating, but has the hidden flag, 
> let's assign it to be Rejected.  If it has no rating and is both hidden 
> and a favorite, let's just make it unrated (the default value).

Thanks for the spec, that's what I'll do then :-)

> 
> >>       * Migration for F-Spot users. Shotwell 0.7 will be able to migrate
> >> an F-Spot library to Shotwell by reading the F-Spot database directly.
> >> Tags and ratings from F-Spot will be preserved. If a user has edited a
> >> photo in F-Spot, the latest version of the photo (and, perhaps, the
> >> original version too) will be available in Shotwell.
> >> [http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/139]
> >>      
> > Events will be preserved too. Places and People will be imported as
> > tags.
> >
> > However, note that, because Shotwell doesn't support nested tags, F-Spot
> > nested tags will result in several (unrelated) tags in Shotwell. That
> > is, unless ticket 1401 is implemented too:
> >    
> >>       * hierarchical tags  [http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/1401]
> >>      
> 
> Right.  We'd love to implement hierarchical tags, but there may just not 
> be time for this release.  We'll see what happens.

Of course, so worst case scenario, the import will create multiple tags.

Bruno