[Shotwell] Glade or handcraft?

Adam Dingle adam at yorba.org
Mon May 10 08:55:40 PDT 2010


Bengt,

we're currently moving toward using Glade for all dialogs in Shotwell.  
The situation you described, where a patch was reviewed after 3-6 
months, would be very unusual in Shotwell; we've always reviewed all 
patches within a couple of days.  If large Glade merges become a 
practical problem in the future we could possibly reconsider this, but 
for the moment we're happy with Glade, and as Vadim pointed out it has 
significant benefits.

adam

On 05/08/2010 07:12 AM, Bengt Thuree wrote:
> In this case I think that the glade file was at a couple of thousand
> lines, and a patch was submitted that included GUI fixes.
>
> The patch was reviewed 3-6 months further down the track, and at that time
> the  glade file had been modified (minor and major changes) many times....
>
> Was very difficult or more or less impossible to patch the glade file.
>
>
> /Bengt
>
> Den Lö, 2010-05-08, 23:51 skrev Vadim Peretokin:
>    
>> I surely hope not, sacrificing a no-recompile UI development cycle,
>> and a *much* faster and easier way to create and edit interfaces just
>> so you can comprehend the whole UI in your mind by reading some code
>> is a big step backwards.
>>
>>
>>      
>
>    




More information about the Shotwell mailing list