[Shotwell] shotwell with 100k pics: somewhere between quite fast and too slow
oliver at first.in-berlin.de
Mon Aug 15 03:33:19 PDT 2011
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 02:57:32AM +0200, oliver wrote:
> Because my last mail was too big for the mailinglist,
> I put the results online; they are temporarily available here:
This file contains:
sysprof_shotwell_only_open-close-of-picture_withoutstartquit.xml (sampled without program startup/quit)
sysprof_shotwell_open-andclose-pictures.xml (sampled just starting/quitting)
sysprof_shotwell_open-close_1.xml (sampled just starting/quitting)
sysprof_shotwell_openclose_2.xml (sampled just starting/quitting)
sysprof_shotwell_scrolling-overview.xml (sampled arbiritraily scrolling)
The scrolling issue is not critical, it is comparingly fast.
I just added it for "completeness".
P.S.: When I first experimented with the sysprof,
I also had results with huge time spent in sqlite3.
But I could not reproduce that later.
(And I did not saved the results.)
More information about the Shotwell